Sahel International Journal of Economic and Development Studies (SIJEDS)

Ethno-Religious Conflict And Agricultural Livelihoods In Lamurde Local Government Area Of Adamawa State

Faith Michael*, Al-Amin Umar Ibrahim, Tope Isaiah Omotosho, Jibrilla Hamza Modibbo
Faith Michael — Government Girls Mega College, Doma, Gombe State, Nigeria
Al-Amin Umar Ibrahim — Department of Economics, Northwest University, Sokoto, Nigeria
Tope Isaiah Omotosho — Children and Family Health Foundation, Aroniro’s Crescent, Odo-dofin Street, Off Otun Road, Iro-Ekiti, Moba LGA, Ekiti State
Jibrilla Hamza Modibbo — Department of General Studies, School of Humanities and Creative Arts, Federal Polytechnic Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author
Sahel International Journal of Economic and Development Studies (SIJEDS) · Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026) · pp. 26-37
Published 14 October 2026
9 views
Abstract
This study examines ethno-religious conflict and agricultural livelihoods in Lamurde Local Government Area, Adamawa State, Nigeria. A descriptive survey of 385 respondents was used to investigate conflict exposure, crop production, farmland access, livestock livelihoods, and agricultural rehabilitation. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analysed using frequencies and percentages. Conflict exposure was reported by 300 respondents (77.92%), while 215 (55.84%) described significant or severe agricultural disruption. Reported crop-yield reductions exceeded 50% for 225 respondents (58.44%), and 175 (45.45%) reported severely reduced or completely lost farmland access. Herd-size reduction was reported by 250 respondents (64.94%), while 205 (53.25%) selected livestock-income loss categories exceeding 50%. Agricultural rehabilitation was reported by 270 respondents (70.13%). Agricultural inputs were the most frequently selected recovery option, followed by equipment support and financial aid. These findings indicate widespread perceived disruption across crop and livestock livelihoods and highlight the importance of combining agricultural assistance with secure access to productive resources. Interpretation is limited by self-reported outcomes, the descriptive design, and inconsistencies in conditional response totals. The study recommends conflict-sensitive input assistance, livestock services, inclusive local mediation, and improved monitoring of agricultural recovery. It contributes locally grounded evidence on the livelihood challenges experienced by agricultural communities in a conflict-affected setting.

Keywords: Ethno-Religious Conflict, Agricultural Livelihoods, Crop Production, Livestock, Rehabilitation, Lamurde